<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Boxcutters - An Australian TV Podcast - Latest Comments in Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.disqus.com/</link><description>An Australian Podcast all about Television</description><atom:link href="https://boxcutters.disqus.com/yasmin_is_no_longer_getting_married8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:48:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt; "funny how David Mott named The Wedge as one of Tenâ€™s hits, considering last weekâ€™s ep got only 26,000 more viewers than Yasminâ€™s premiere"&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As we've said before on the show it's all about perception with 10 - like last year: The OC was a cool, hip hit on 10 whilst rating about the same as Last Man Stand, seen as a disaster on 7.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I actually think it was pretty ballsy of 10 to can Yasmin so quickly. Thinking they have had a good run of new shows this year but this one has failed, so pulling it quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OMG I just noticed my ring finger is bare. So's the cupboard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good riddance, I say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kerrie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ten are paying for the wedding, if and when it happens through the more standard matchmaking activities - according to the &lt;a href="" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title=""&gt;SMH&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like this nugget: \"My ring finger has been bare for too long.\" Uh-huh...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bah damn not being logged in. I have to write this message just to claim that terrible pun :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fourthof5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder in Channel 10 still have to pay for the wedding, or did they leave her at the alter :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and isn't it great to see a Ten show flop as badly as a Seven or Nine show?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- daniel g online at gmail dot com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 11:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yasmin is no longer getting married&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/08/06/yasmin-is-no-longer-getting-married/#comment-4979028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a statement at &lt;a href="http://YasminsGettingMarried.com.au" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="YasminsGettingMarried.com.au"&gt;YasminsGettingMarried.com.au&lt;/a&gt; - funny how David Mott named The Wedge as one of Ten's hits, considering last week's ep got only 26,000 more viewers than Yasmin's premiere. I think the reasons Yasmin's show did badly (from the first two eps I saw) was:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) There didn't seem to be any structure to the show, which is what reality game shows need - Big Brother has nomination, eviction and the weekly task; Survivor has challenges, immunity, and tribal council. Yasmin's first two shows were spent whittling six bachelors down to one to go on a date with her - boring - and I couldn't see how Yasmin was going to go from single to married!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) We heard fuck-all from Yasmin - and only got to see her through prerecorded segments. It would've been better if Jo Stanley occasionally asked Yasmin how she was going, live in the studio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ten should've given Yasmin at least another week to see if ratings would lift - I was going to watch at least once this week to see if things were more exciting, had Ten not axed the show this weekend. But thankfully, they're &lt;em&gt;finally&lt;/em&gt; screening Futurama! Pity they're gonna be burning through the "all-new" episodes fairly fast, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, that's &lt;em&gt;two&lt;/em&gt; failed shows Jo Stanley's been associated with now!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- daniel g online at gmail dot com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>