<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Boxcutters - An Australian TV Podcast - Latest Comments in Ten&amp;#8217;s short breaks</title><link>http://boxcutters.disqus.com/</link><description>An Australian Podcast all about Television</description><atom:link href="https://boxcutters.disqus.com/ten8217s_short_breaks/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:51:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ten&amp;#8217;s short breaks</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/10/22/tens-short-breaks/#comment-4979154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they're just taking a page out of Nova's book...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel G</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:51:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ten&amp;#8217;s short breaks</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2006/10/22/tens-short-breaks/#comment-4979153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, I agree. And although I haven't studied it fully I get the feeling the next ad break is longer to accommodate additional ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there is no "Hey, go to the toilet, these ads go FOREVER" type voiceover.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>