<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Boxcutters - An Australian TV Podcast - Latest Comments in Futurama Update</title><link>http://boxcutters.disqus.com/</link><description>An Australian Podcast all about Television</description><atom:link href="https://boxcutters.disqus.com/futurama_update/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:32:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Futurama Update</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/17/futurama-update/#comment-4979555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if Channel 10 will end up showing it.  They probably will because it will be avaliable on DVD before it can be screened (just like Battlestar Galactica).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nigel P</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:32:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Futurama Update</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/17/futurama-update/#comment-4979554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That there will be a new &lt;em&gt;Futurama&lt;/em&gt; is the best news the universe has ever heard this millenium. Who cares if it's direct-to-DVD? TV sucks. DVD is the better medium.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real WTF is - why does the iF magazine interview have the name of every TV show in bold? And why is the text formatted like a monkey on crack wrote it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TV does suck, but website "designers" suck even more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dishy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 05:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>