Community Page
- boxcutters.net/blog Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- No, please, ACMA! I'll do anything! Just don't make me prepare an updated handout!
- http://acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_311795 ACMA shows its force off again
- Too spooky is the Boxcutter's kiss of death. Who will be next?!? I await with baited breath and will surely take a deep breath next time ANY actor's name is mentioned!
- I think the video podcast (boxcutters.net/vlog) has been doctored! If you look very carefully you'll notice John isn't moving at all. Or is that Brett...?
- @kerrie: She was so the freakin' best.
Boxcutters - An Australian TV Podcast
An Australian Podcast all about Television
Lots of good stuff
Lots of News
Lots of Jess McGuire (after lots of time with none)
Lots of anger over Telstra and Sopranos spoilsports
Lots of animated Golden Age of Television
A little Sesame
Lots of pork
Lots of fun
Lots of ways:
RSS feed
iTunes
Direct Download
Lots ... Continue reading »
Lots of News
Lots of Jess McGuire (after lots of time with none)
Lots of anger over Telstra and Sopranos spoilsports
Lots of animated Golden Age of Television
A little Sesame
Lots of pork
Lots of fun
Lots of ways:
RSS feed
iTunes
Direct Download
Lots ... Continue reading »
2 years ago
2 years ago
Futurama was obviously not supposed to be The Simpsons, otherwise it would have been The Simpsons. The characters are different, the humour's different, the topicality's different, the stories are different, the emotional involvement is different. Yes the character design is similar, but that's where it ends. It's hell trying to explain this to people.
For what it's worth, Futurama was loads funnier than any Simpsons from those years.
2 years ago
2 years ago
That was hilarious, and I don't think the messages are that smartly included into the show. I still like it but I don't like the preachy episodes much at all. They just aren't funny. I am a fan of Family Guy as its simply a funny show with no message, the cutaways are great in my opinion as to me they are like sketches within the show. Allowing it to be much more free form.
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
I've not seen South Park in a few years (and, for the record, Howard's turned me into a horribly biased lefty), but my memories of it are that it was always reasonably balanced: not toeing any particular line, rather taking a position outside the left-right spectrum and just standing up to anything they didn't like. Is that accurate?
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
If 50-year-old fringe-dwellers demanded proper broadband, we'd have it by now. Technology is the domain of yoof, and yoof don't keep Howard in office. AM radio does. Mabel doesn't use the internet because it's full of shonky businessmen and terrorists.
Meanwhile Coonan's pushing the digital television barrow (a) because she has to, it's in her performance review; (b) because Australians need to be forced to take up digital (clearly they hate new technology); (c) on the pretence that free-to-air's even going to be relevant in 10 years. Actually, it will, because by 2017 we STILL won't have proper broadband.
But let's say for argument's sake that Howard's broadband plan goes ahead. $1.8 billion for a consortium to build a 'very fast' 12 Mbit/s service, at no cost to the taxpayer. Looks nice on paper, until you realise the rest of the money has to come from the consumer, at prices that only some can afford. The ALP's proposal is a bit flaccid, but at least it spreads the cost and doesn't expand the rich/poor gulf.
Not to mention that 12 Mbit/s is arguably rubbish when it comes to streaming SD content, let alone HD. 12 Mbit/s is roughly 1.5 Mbytes/s before overhead, which is what I get now anyway.
Is it just coincidence that Liberal technology ministers always look like Thunderbirds? Coonan, Alston, Stockdale...
2 years ago
Here we go... whinge whinge whinge whinge about "broadband" speeds again... and when you get 12Mbps you'll be wanting 1Gb - never bloody satisfied...
Yes, Adam D - John Howard, the man who gave name to the Non-Core Promise(TM), elevating it to new heights. Another countryman.
...
I have some friends (believe it or not) with Foxtel who don't even consider ch 7 or 10 because there is no EPG. I agree that Nine would be mad to give it up, but why is it that 7 and 10 have never signed up? Surely the expense is commercially valuable, particularly for 7 - it seems that the growing market of pay tv is still being largely ignored.
2 years ago
12 Mbit/s is a respectable speed for most things, but in 2009 terms it's not 'very fast,' as Howard would have us believe. That American professor bloke in your link makes a good point about future-proofing, but going to 1 Gb capacity now would be prohibitively expensive, not to mention completely unjustifiable.
South Korea has 100 Mbit/s FTTP (which I think is what this feller is proposing) but it's a small, tech-riddled country with a population that jumps at this stuff. Australia's no gadget slouch, but it doesn't have a market that is crying out for impossible speeds, nor will it in the near future. ADSL1 is still a novelty to many of us.
2 years ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0dzZTPWrSM
2 years ago
Oh, too, what is this Sassame street you speak of? ;)
I too rarely watch 7 or 10 on Foxtel because of the lack of EPG.
Great Ep.
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
I think it's pretty clear they are. Matt Stone is actually a registered Republican, Trey Parker a registered Libertarian. They are on record as saying that hate "liberals" more than Republicans.
Their style of balance is like Fox News - very misleading. It is funny when they aren't doing their political schtick, though.
2 years ago