<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Boxcutters - An Australian TV Podcast - Latest Comments in Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.disqus.com/</link><description>An Australian Podcast all about Television</description><atom:link href="https://boxcutters.disqus.com/boxcutters_episode_77/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:44:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is a real shame about Heroes Kerrie. I can see how that would be an issue. Maybe it is contributing to the ratings bottoming out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ad free it seems to flow quite well. Maybe some sort of PVR is called for to limit the impact of ads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:44:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The ads during Heroes are driving me bonkers, so I agree with catbrain about them spoiling the flow. There are a lot of storylines and characters to follow in each ep and when it keeps getting broken up by ads (it feels like every 5 mins) I feel a little disconnected (oh, hello! back from the ad - where are we now? which hero is this?). I'm enjoying it less and less because of that. I feel as though it just gets into a rhythm and it's over for another week and my brain is all disjointed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or maybe there's a problem with my brain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kerrie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, astrogirl. Glad to have you join us. If you have a listen to episode 78 you'll find it a bit more of what we're usually like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 04:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm probably late to the party, but just listened to this. (first time listener, long time reader hehe) Just wanted to mention that there is indeed a S2 of Dexter in the works. There is news all over the internet about it. But that would involve, you know, research. lol :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">astrogirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:23:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I was shocked with Josh's funniest show on TV at the moment comment. Each to their own I suppose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And Dishy I completely agree about Simpsons. The decline was and continues to be heartbreaking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think South Park is pretty good, especially when they nail it. Often though they just lose me. I used to say it was maybe 50/50, but season 10 was a really improvement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:47:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd have to disagree with Josh's comments on South Park.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't expect a lot from South Park. I continue to watch the show because &lt;strong&gt;I expect so little&lt;/strong&gt;. In contrast, I used to expect a lot from &lt;em&gt;The Simpsons&lt;/em&gt;, because they had such a high standard to live up to. This made their decline in quality so much more disappointing - it was like sacrelige.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, &lt;em&gt;South Park&lt;/em&gt; never had a high standard to live up to. Therefore, any time they have a good episode, it seems really good, because your frame-of-reference is such a low standard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dishy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You is very funny mans.  It was like listening to a group of drunk friends in the pub trying to keep up with the conversation.  *grin*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Isn't it funny how opinions can be so diametrically opposed:  I thought last week's ep of &lt;i&gt;Spicks and Specks&lt;/i&gt; was very beige - the blandest to date.  Ari Up just made me cringe, which was very disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From anecdotal evidence only, I reckon you're on the money re &lt;i&gt;Heroes&lt;/i&gt; ratings and downloading.  Another suggestion from a friend was that having the ads in spoils the flow a little, which may contribute to downloading.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although it was dross, it was fun to see Richard Carter do menacing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">catbrain</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good episode, interesting episode for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Beckham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, Gunther von Hagens. You know, in his younger days (still with hair and without the black fedora) he looked rather like Hugh Grant. &lt;a href="http://www.bodyworlds.com/en/gunther_von_hagens/life.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bodyworlds.com/en/gunther_von_hagens/life.html"&gt;Can you see it&lt;/a&gt;? I watched The Anatomist last night. I hope one day I too can have a "happy polymer birthday" spent alone plastinating post mortem internal organs, or perhaps an ox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Boxcutter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One Ray watch / I don't buy it for me this week was 60 Minutes' "Oh My God" tag line for the ep. I mean this is supposed to be Nines flag ship current affairs programme. It was nothing but the usual ACA /TT sensationalist dribble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fourthof5</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 77</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/03/19/boxcutters-episode-77/#comment-4979558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ok, time to lay off the granola kids:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markymarc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>