<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Boxcutters - An Australian TV Podcast - Latest Comments in Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.disqus.com/</link><description>An Australian Podcast all about Television</description><atom:link href="https://boxcutters.disqus.com/boxcutters_episode_101/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:54:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, yes, I see your point.  SMS voting could extend the life of the show considerably.  Five weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:54:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That how long your giving it ? I think it will work, given the current audience habits, it will probably work better now than it did originally. Think of the SMS / Voting possibilities. Should "Crusher Carl" smash "contender john" in the nuts. SMS 12emasculate or 2Save.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fourthof5</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Three weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Channel Seven today announced television phenomenon Gladiators will return to our screens in 2008.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seven’s Head of Program Development, Mr Brad Lyons, said the search begins this week across Australia for a new generation of Gladiators.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“We’re extremely excited about re-launching this massive show which was such an audience favourite, “Mr Lyons said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“It will have a new look but will still retain the classic battles between Gladiator and Contender. We are currently on the hunt for a new bunch of Gladiators and those prepared to step into the arena to take them on.”&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fourthof5</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh and while I'm here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/tv--radio/news-chief-lashes-cowardly-attackers/2007/09/10/1189276598817.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theage.com.au/news/tv--radio/news-chief-lashes-cowardly-attackers/2007/09/10/1189276598817.html"&gt;7 news chief calls someone else 'cowardly and despicable'&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam D</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know where to put this, and don't intend to derail the Chaser topic:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Summer Heights High is magnificent.  By contrast, last night's instalment of Kath &amp;amp; Kim made my nose bleed.  Fine, you're on commercial television, but that doesn't give you licence to infest your entire production with the most obvious product placement I've seen in a very, very long time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm paraphrasing here but it lays down the gist:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'This Smart car is so economical!  And so comfortable!'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'Don't eat my Go-Gurt, Sharon!  Get your own Go-Gurt!  Go-Gurt Go-Gurt Go-Gurt'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'Theatreworks is nice, isn't it?  I enjoyed that cultured performance at Theatreworks!  Ahh, Theatreworks.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And so on.  Meanwhile nobody's attending to jokes or a plot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam D</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to take anything away from "HOT GOSSIP!!", but how about "Rumour-Phile"? Of course, you'd probably need to constantly say: "And now it's time for Rumour-Phile...with a "PH"..." &lt;br&gt;But you've got to admit - pretty sexy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rilestar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry Ross... I guess the scoreboard just doesn't lie.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's time to post a photo of you in action in the studio. Or perhaps a screen-cap from the video podcast (sorry to be vlogging the proverbially dead horse). I &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; do the screen-cap thing but I don't know how ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Boxcutter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Geez… First I’m “and sidekick”, then nobody can tell me apart from Brett, now I’m relegated to just the ‘background’ in the video podcast. My star is falling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I never!  I didn't expect to hear "vagina" and I'm certain the packed tram didn't expect to hear my raucous laughter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great to hear James Talia "in the flesh", but it would be good if the 4th Boxcutter was a female voice... so James, with your sportscasting background, do you think you could go a little &lt;b&gt;Footy Show&lt;/b&gt; next time and frock up to bring out your feminine side?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Times&lt;/b&gt; was great.  It was more editorial in the pop-up comments, rather than explanatory, but cutting through the spin of the story, exposing the flaws in whatever argument.  At least, that's the way I remember it - the comments could be quite sarcastic at times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Boxcutters Confidential&lt;/i&gt; sounds like the Daily Telegraph.  How about &lt;i&gt;Scuttlebutt&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I reckon that until people can visualise what Brett and Ross look like (realistically - although those &lt;b&gt;South Park&lt;/b&gt;-esque pics are pretty good), they will continue to mistake you both.  It's Ross in the background on the video podcast, if that helps. (thereisnovideopodcast)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">catbrain</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:51:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See I have to admit I find this a little perplexing. While I can except a slight tonal similarity between our dulcet voices, surely content wise there are vast differences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it that hard to distinguish Brett’s laid back, happy go luck demeanour from my world-weary, jaded cynicism?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:13:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Mike: Welcome to the very large club. &lt;a href="http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/bross/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/bross/"&gt;Here's a foolproof way to tell them apart&lt;/a&gt; (other than peering intently at the video podcast).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Boxcutter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I must be one of the people who can't tell Ross and Brett apart because it took me 1/2 way into the show to notice that both of you were there along with James...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Beckham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:11:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone remember Attitude?  On the ABC?  With Samantha wossface?  That was hip/def/groovy like The Times.  Didn't last long if I recall correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me be the first to nit-pick about Buffy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Giles IS Ripper. When the press release says "Ripper sees Giles in England", I think it means Ripper the show, not the character.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other guy from England was Ethan Rayne, and to nit-pick further, both of them have appeared in the Buffy comic (Ethan in a dream sequence, Giles appears chatting to a demon).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really liked "The Times", although a friend of mine used to call it "T-T-Times! C-Cool News! for Y-Young P-People!!" complete with street pose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And then Frontline took it off in a great episode with Harry Shearer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;you could say when it came to the Times, I was the one doing the rooting...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ActualChad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:57:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxcutters Episode 101</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/09/03/boxcutters-episode-101/#comment-4980310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;jesus... just call it 'Boxcutters Confidential' and get it over with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markymarc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>