-
Website
http://boxcutters.net/blog -
Original page
http://boxcutters.net/blog/2007/12/03/boxcutter-episode-113/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Daniel D Boxcutter
4 comments · 1 points
-
murrayNE
26 comments · 2 points
-
Mike Beckham
4 comments · 1 points
-
daveaa
5 comments · 3 points
-
Daniel Kilby
5 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Spring Break with John Safran
5 days ago · 6 comments
-
Ep 199: The Cult, Ads for Shoes, Garry Shandling
3 weeks ago · 24 comments
-
Ep 200: Myf Warhurst, Highway Patrol, Surprise Guests
2 weeks ago · 15 comments
-
Ep 201: FlashForward, Dominos Pizza, The Future of Television
1 week ago · 4 comments
-
Does Variety Television Actually Exist?
3 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Spring Break with John Safran
:)
The new Futurama movie is fairly bad, not very funny or interesting.
I heart hearts.
Re legal downloads: I've encountered free legal download files for market research purposes that don't allow you to rewind or ffwd through ads - you can play, pause and stop only. I think the excuse that legal downloads killed whatever-show-it-was is a crock, or perhaps they just didn't employ the right technology in the first place.
@FulltimeCasual: cheeky... :-D
just wondering, has anyone found an episode of Satisfaction on the usual sites? it doesnt seem to be on diwana just yet..
come on foxtel subscribers, share the love!
check your local guides.
http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?epis...
A few preliminary thoughts:
-everyone who works in commercial news will be able to think of times they've done stories they wish they hadn't;
-I can think of endless occasions when competitors have branded stories as exclusives when, in fact, they were the only newsroom to bother covering a story everyone else knew about but decided against;
-The aphorisms hold true across the developed world... if it bleeds, it leads and some days you're really just filling the black.
I can also think of numerous occasions when I've phoned my boss from the road to say the story is actually a non-story. On EVERY single occasion, I've been told, "You're the guy on the road, I'm trusting your judgement, can the yarn." Self-evidently, not every news director or chief of staff is like that.
But above all else, neglecting to contact the subject of a story - as opposed to seeking a response but failing to get one - is inexcusable.
Without mentioning details or networks, I've seen and heard of a couple of instances in Mebourne where certain reporters and news bosses have not only crossed the line - they've taken up permanent residence on the other side. Everyone knows who they are. Everyone scorns them. There is still plenty of principle in the ranks of Australian reporting but it's not universal.
I highly recommend this podcast to the Boxcutters family.
Thanks very much for the link, FC.
Snap! I logged on to post about the The American Life newsroom story.
I would think that would be illegal too.
Some people have ethics.
Some people have "etics", like Johnny Caspar. (If you have to ask...).
(I'm reminded of Robin Williams' skit about the UN: "Stop! or I'll say 'Stop!' again")
That's all.
...without turning this into (another) diatribe againt 'the meeja', ANY industry that self-regulates is inevitably going to be it's own worst enemy. It's just bound to happen; what if fast food places didn't have to worry about health inspections? What if tattslotto didn't have govt oversight? What if politicians have to face their electorates?
External oversight is key...
Sadly, it's far more common for an Australian cricketer to 'walk' without prompting, than it is for a journo to be forced to resign over a deliberate ethical breech.
"you know what I mean-"